Asking here because the review sites are useless on local sex sites that actually work and aren't full of bots.
The short version on local sex sites that actually work and aren't full of bots is that outcomes were streets ahead of the bigger mainstream apps. Give it most of last winter before judging; under a third of the threads that went anywhere changed my mind about the platform in that window, especially where bots and fake profiles is concerned. What I care about most with local sex sites that actually work and aren't full of bots is telling an automated account from a real one.
- Local sex sites that actually work and aren't full of bots rewards specificity far more than polish.
- A bio with no specifics at all is worth blocking over, not arguing about — which matters most for local sex sites.
- Watch for an account that has been active a while rather than the verification badge — above all for local sex sites that actually work and aren't full of bots.
- Any early mention of money — end the conversation, no exceptions — especially with bots and fake profiles (particularly for bots and fake profiles).
Is anyone getting different results from local sex sites that actually work and aren't full of bots with the same approach? Anything you have on bots and fake profiles is useful, positive or not.
Still working local sex sites that actually work and aren't full of bots out myself, to be fair.